Why this paper matters
Physical inactivity contributes to more than 3 million premature deaths globally each year, yet one in four adults worldwide does not meet basic activity recommendations. Most physical activity research focuses on structured exercise, dedicated workouts, gym sessions, scheduled runs, things that require time most people say they do not have. This study from researchers at the University of Glasgow, University of Ferrara, and collaborating institutions in Chile and Thailand takes a different approach. It asks whether the small, incidental physical activity built into daily life, specifically climbing the stairs at home, is associated with meaningful reductions in disease risk. Using the UK Biobank, one of the largest and most rigorously followed cohorts in the world, they had the statistical power to answer a question that smaller studies could not: does stair climbing matter across not just cardiovascular disease, but respiratory disease, cancer, diabetes, and dementia as well.
What they did
Raisi and colleagues analyzed data from 442,027 UK Biobank participants (mean age 56) who had complete information on stair use and relevant covariates, drawn from an original cohort of 502,628 people recruited between 2007 and 2010. At enrollment, participants answered a single question: at home, during the last 4 weeks, about how many times a day do you climb a flight of stairs, approximately 10 steps? Responses were categorized into five groups: none, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, and more than 15 times daily. Researchers then tracked incident cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke), COPD, all-cause cancer, type 2 diabetes, all-cause dementia, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality over a median follow-up of 10.9 years, using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted sequentially for sociodemographic factors, lifestyle factors including total physical activity and BMI, and multimorbidity.
What they found
Over the follow-up period, 26,506 participants (6.0%) died, 50,295 (11.4%) developed cardiovascular disease, 61,308 (13.9%) developed cancer, and 4,369 (0.9%) developed dementia. Climbing more than 15 flights of stairs daily was associated with a lower risk of 8 of the 9 outcomes studied compared to no stair use, with the magnitude ranging from a 3% lower risk of all-cause cancer to a 51% lower risk of developing COPD. For mortality specifically, hazard ratios ranged from 0.82 for all-cause cancer death to 0.46 for COPD death, a 54% reduction. Notably, the researchers identified a threshold effect for several outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, COPD, and type 2 diabetes: the maximum benefit appeared at around 6 flights of stairs per day, roughly 60 steps, with no additional benefit observed beyond that point. For all-cause dementia, the relationship was U-shaped, with the lowest risk observed among people climbing 6 to 15 flights daily (HR 0.78). The associations for COPD, dementia, and type 2 diabetes remained essentially unchanged even after excluding people with existing chronic illness, those unable to walk unaided, and anyone who developed an outcome within the first two years of follow-up, steps taken specifically to rule out reverse causation. The associations for myocardial infarction and stroke, however, were attenuated in these sensitivity analyses, suggesting some of that specific signal may reflect people who were already becoming unwell climbing fewer stairs, rather than stair climbing itself protecting them.
What the numbers actually mean
The threshold finding is the most clinically useful piece of this paper, and the easiest part to miss if you only read the headline. This is not a "more is always better" relationship for every outcome. For cardiovascular disease, COPD, and type 2 diabetes, roughly 6 flights of stairs per day, about 60 steps, captured most of the measurable benefit, with climbing far more than that adding little further reduction in risk. That is a genuinely achievable target for almost anyone with stairs in their home or workplace, which is precisely the point the authors are making about incidental activity as a public health strategy: it does not require a gym membership, a scheduled hour, or specialized equipment, and the ceiling for meaningful benefit is lower than most people would assume.
The COPD findings deserve particular attention. A 51% lower incidence and 55% lower mortality is a large effect size for an observational study, and the authors are appropriately cautious about it. Reverse causation, people who already have early, undiagnosed lung disease naturally avoiding stairs, is a real competing explanation, and the authors flag this directly as a limitation requiring further study, ideally using Mendelian randomization to help establish whether the relationship is causal. The dementia finding is similarly provisional. A U-shaped curve in observational data is intriguing, but establishing why very high stair use did not confer additional benefit, or whether people who developed early cognitive changes gradually reduced their stair use before diagnosis, is not something this study design can resolve on its own.
What the sensitivity analyses do support with more confidence is the association with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and cancer mortality, which held up even after the researchers took steps specifically designed to exclude people whose reduced stair use might have been an early symptom of undiagnosed illness rather than a cause of it.
Limitations worth knowing
- —Stair use was self-reported via a single questionnaire item and restricted to home-based activity, excluding stair use at work or in public spaces, which likely undercounts total stair exposure for many participants and introduces potential reporting bias.
- —Reverse causation remains a genuine concern for several outcomes, particularly stroke and myocardial infarction, where the association weakened substantially in sensitivity analyses designed to exclude people with early undiagnosed disease.
- —UK Biobank had a 5.5% recruitment rate and is not representative of the general UK population in terms of lifestyle and health, participants tend to be healthier and more affluent than the population at large, which may limit how broadly these findings generalize.
- —Several outcomes, including COPD and dementia, had a relatively small number of events, which can make effect size estimates less stable and wider confidence intervals more likely.
- —As an observational study, this research can identify strong and consistent associations but cannot establish causation on its own.
The bottom line
A daily habit costing nothing and requiring no special time set aside, climbing roughly six flights of stairs, about 60 steps, was associated with meaningfully lower risk across nearly every major chronic disease category studied, including cardiovascular disease, COPD, type 2 diabetes, and several mortality outcomes. The benefit largely plateaued beyond that point, meaning the target for most people is genuinely modest and achievable. This does not replace structured exercise or established public health guidance, but it is a compelling argument that incidental physical activity, built into the ordinary architecture of daily life, deserves a more prominent place in how clinicians counsel patients about movement.
Paper reviewed
Raisi A, Boonpor J, Breheny M, Vasquez J, Matus C, Diaz-Martinez X, Pell JP, Ho FK, Celis-Morales C. "Association of Stair Use With Risk of Major Chronic Diseases." American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024;66(2):324-332. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2023.10.007. Available free full text at: https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/307850/2/307850.pdf